The Matrescent Path

Two weeks ago, I wrote about identity rupture — the strange and often frightening experience of no longer feeling like the self you once were, while not yet having language for the self that is emerging. Last week, I wrote about the maternal nervous system — the physiological reality that motherhood is not only emotional, but deeply regulatory. I explored how a mother’s body becomes part of the dyadic system through which an infant learns safety, regulation, and attachment, and how modern motherhood asks women to carry that co-regulatory labor with far too little support.

This piece builds from both. If the earlier essay named the fracture at the level of identity, and the second named the strain at the level of the nervous system, The Matrescent Path brings those realities into a fuller developmental frame. It is a map of becoming a mother — a way of understanding the recurring stages many women move through as the self is disrupted, reorganized, and gradually remade.

The Matrescent Path is a developmental map of identity reorganization in motherhood. It names the recurring stages many women move through as they become someone they have never been before. It is not a prescription or a timetable. It is a framework for orientation: for mothers living it, and for the people meant to support them.

It has six stages. Women often move through them in sequence, though not on any predictable schedule. Some stages compress; some stretch for years. A woman may cycle back through earlier stages when a second child arrives, or when a disruption dismantles the scaffolding she had rebuilt. The Path is not linear in the way that a staircase is linear. It is more like a river: forward-moving, but shaped by the particular terrain it travels through.

The Path is also not meant to flatten difference, replace clinical care, or force every mother into a single arc. Women who came to motherhood through loss, trauma, adoption, or at the edges of the expected timeline bring particular histories that shape how the stages are experienced and how long they last. That complexity is held throughout, not resolved.

What the stages share — what makes them a path rather than a set of disconnected experiences — is the underlying developmental question each one is asking: who am I now that I am also a mother? Each stage answers a piece of it. Understanding each stage does two things. For the mother inside one, it offers orientation — the felt sense of this is where I am, and this is why it feels this way. For the clinicians, doulas, partners, and communities holding her, it offers a map for witnessing rather than fixing.

The Path draws on Dana Raphael’s concept of matrescence (1973), Robert Kegan’s theory of adult development (1982, 1994), William Bridges’ transitions framework (1980), and the developmental psychology of Jane Loevinger (1976), integrated with the neuroscience of the postpartum maternal brain (Hoekzema et al., 2017; Feldman, 2017; Porges, 2011). It is also drawn from a decade of working directly with mothers navigating this passage — and from living it.

The Architecture of the Path

Before the stages themselves, it helps to understand the developmental logic underneath them.

Matrescence is what developmental psychologists call a marker event — a transition so significant that it reorganizes the self around a new set of demands, relationships, and ways of making meaning. Robert Kegan’s work on adult development offers the most precise frame for what this reorganization involves (Kegan, 1982, 1994).

In Kegan’s model, adults move through a series of qualitative shifts in how they construct identity. First, the Socialized Mind: identity built around the expectations and approval of others, the self defined by its relationships and roles. Then the Self-Authoring Mind: identity built from an internal value system the person has constructed for themselves, no longer dependent on external authority for its coherence. And rarely, the Self-Transforming Mind: which can hold multiple self-authored systems simultaneously, without needing any one of them to be final.

Most adults are somewhere in the transition between the Socialized and Self-Authoring Mind when they become mothers. Matrescence — with its relentless, years-long pressure to update the self’s operating system as the child changes, to release the external approval that organized the pre-mother identity, to find authority from within rather than without — may function as a powerful catalyst for that transition in many women. Kegan estimates that fewer than half of adults ever fully reach the Self-Authoring Mind (1994). For some women, motherhood appears to be what makes it possible.

This is not a reason to romanticize difficulty. The transition to the Self-Authoring Mind is not simply the reward for surviving early motherhood. It is a developmental outcome that is also, in many cases, a developmental demand: motherhood asks of the woman a kind of self-authority she may not yet have, and the strain of that demand is real. But understanding where the demand comes from — understanding that the disorientation is developmental rather than pathological — changes what kind of support is needed.

Each stage of the Matrescent Path corresponds to a recognizable moment in this arc. The early stages are organized around the Socialized Mind: external scripts, cultural expectations, the performance of the kind of mother one has been told to be. The middle stages are the rupture — the place where the external scaffolding collapses and the internal one has not yet been built. The later stages are the emergence of self-authorship: identity no longer borrowed from authority, but constructed from the inside.

Stage 1: Pre-Motherhood — The Inherited Architecture of Becoming

She has not yet held the baby. She does not know what the baby will feel like. But she already has a mother — a specific, complicated mother — and she grew up inside a particular version of what motherhood meant, and she has absorbed, without choosing to, every image of a mother she has ever encountered. All of that is already inside her, shaping what she expects. None of it was chosen. None of it will transfer cleanly.

Women often carry blueprints into motherhood. They arrived early — laid down before there was language to question them: in the way her own mother moved through a room, in the particular texture of being held or not held, in every cultural image of motherhood she absorbed before she had the developmental capacity to evaluate it critically. They are not ideology. They are something more embodied than that — a set of implicit expectations about what motherhood will feel like, what kind of mother she will be, what she will lose, what she will gain. Many of them are below conscious awareness. Some are contradictory. Some are wrong. But they are operative: shaping her anticipation, her fear, her hope, and the particular version of herself she is already beginning to construct.

Pre-Motherhood is the stage of the constructed anticipation. It includes not just the period of trying to conceive or pregnancy, but the entire developmental prehistory that a woman brings to the threshold — her attachment history, her relationship with her own mother, her cultural context, her experience of her own body, her sense of herself as someone who could or could not be a mother. All of this becomes relevant once the reality of motherhood arrives, because the gap between the blueprints and the lived experience is the first site of rupture on the Path.

William Bridges, in his foundational work on life transitions, describes this as the stage of endings — the period in which the existing structure of the self is still largely intact, but beginning to loosen around the edges as the transition approaches (Bridges, 1980). A woman in late pregnancy often feels this loosening: a particular quality of threshold awareness, of being simultaneously herself and not-yet who she is becoming. The identity has not yet broken. But it has begun to know that it will.

Clinically and practically, what matters most at this stage is not the blueprints themselves — no one arrives at motherhood without them — but awareness of them. The woman who can name her blueprints, however partially, has some capacity to grieve the gap when the real experience differs from the anticipated one. The woman who cannot name them meets that gap as pure disorientation, with no developmental language for what is happening.

One of the most important things a doula, therapist, or midwife can offer at this stage is not information about birth or feeding, though those matter. It is an invitation to surface the blueprints before they run the show invisibly. What did your own mother’s motherhood look like? What do you expect to feel? What are you most afraid of? What do you believe, at the level below your stated beliefs, about what kind of mother you will be? These are not therapeutic indulgences. They are developmental preparation.

Stage 2: Threshold — The Loosening of The Inherited Becoming

If Pre-Motherhood is the stage of inherited expectation, Threshold is the stage in which that inherited structure begins to loosen.

There is a specific quality of suspension that arrives in the middle of pregnancy — or in the waiting period of adoption — that does not have a good name in most languages. She is still herself. The same body, the same habits, the same voice. And yet something has begun to loosen its grip, some foundational assumption about who she is and what her life means, and she can feel the loosening without being able to name what is loosening. The Dutch have the word tussenstaat, meaning a state between states. William Bridges called it the Neutral Zone (1980). In the developmental literature on matrescence, it is often called the Threshold: the place where the woman is no longer who she was and not yet who she will be.

The Threshold is disorienting in a way that does not present as crisis. The woman is often functioning well, managing the practical preparations, meeting external demands. But internally, the ground is shifting. The identity structures that organized the pre-mother self — the career, the body, the particular rhythms of daily life, the relationship to time — are beginning to feel provisional in a way they did not before. They are not yet gone. But she can feel that they are going.

This is the stage that Kegan would describe as the beginning of the subject-object shift (1982): the process by which things that were previously subject — meaning they were invisible because they were the lens through which she saw, the water she swam in — begin to become object, meaning they become visible to her, available for examination, potentially available for revision. Her previous identity, which was simply who she was, begins to be something she can see. And seeing it, she begins to notice the ways in which it was constructed rather than simply true.

In many indigenous and traditional cultures, this stage was held with ceremony — a liminal container that acknowledged the threshold as real, and named the woman as someone in passage and therefore deserving of protection. The Māori concept of whakapapa frames this moment as a woman’s entry into a new relational position within the web of lineage (Pihama et al., 2014); many Indigenous North American traditions similarly mark this threshold with ceremony, recognizing that a woman crossing a developmental boundary needs her community to hold the crossing (Brave Heart & DeBruyn, 1998). Western culture largely lacks this container. The baby shower, the gender reveal, the maternity photo shoot — each organized around the infant. The woman’s own transition is acknowledged only insofar as it produces a baby.

The clinical implication of this is not abstract. Women who move through the Threshold without any cultural or relational acknowledgment of their own experience arrive at Initiation without preparation, without language, and without the felt sense that what is happening to them is recognized as real. This compounds the shock of the next stage considerably.

The Threshold asks: who will you be on the other side? She does not yet know. That is the point.

Stage 3: Initiation — When The Self Is Taken Apart

Birth — or the arrival of a child through adoption — is both an event and an inauguration. The inauguration is into a set of demands that the previous self was not built for and cannot immediately meet.

Within hours of delivering the placenta, estrogen and progesterone levels fall by a factor of hundreds — the most abrupt endocrine shift the human body can experience (Walker, 2017). The postpartum brain floods with oxytocin and prolactin, rewiring circuits associated with reward, motivation, and threat detection. The amygdala is placed on high alert, responding with exquisite sensitivity to infant cues, to sound, to touch, to the smallest variation in the baby’s breathing (Feldman, 2017).

The experience of this from the inside is not neuroscience. It is a feeling of having been taken apart and left in a pile on the floor.

Initiation is the dissolution stage — what I think of as the forest fire phase. The biological imperative of keeping an infant alive burns through the previous ego structure with a force that has no precedent in adult experience. Sleep is gone. Bodily autonomy is gone. The predictable architecture of the previous self — the competence, the schedule, the relationship to time, the capacity to complete a thought — is largely gone. What remains is a woman who is doing an extraordinary amount of extraordinarily important work, in conditions of extreme physiological depletion, without the developmental software yet installed to make sense of it.

The blueprints, which organized her anticipation and her fear, are now being compared in real time to the actual experience — and the gap is almost always enormous. The love may be present but may not feel the way she expected it to. The competence she expected to find may not be there. The body she expected to return to does not exist yet. The person she expected to remain may feel entirely inaccessible. None of this means anything has gone wrong. It means the dissolution is doing what dissolution does.

At this stage, the distinction between normative developmental intensity and clinical postpartum mood disorders is most important and most difficult to make. The criteria for postpartum depression include low mood, sleep disturbance, emotional reactivity, loss of previous interests, and difficulty experiencing pleasure — all of which are also features of the dissolution stage of healthy matrescence. The differential is not in the presence of these experiences, but in their quality, trajectory, and the degree to which they are accompanied by a loss of the sense that the self has value, rather than simply a loss of the self’s previous form.

Freud’s distinction between mourning and melancholia is clinically useful here (Freud, 1917): in mourning, the world feels altered and strange, but the self retains its sense of worth. In melancholia, the self is what has become impoverished. A woman in Initiation is almost certainly mourning — mourning the previous self, the previous life, the anticipated experience that did not arrive. She may not be in melancholia. The distinction matters because the intervention differs: one needs witnessing and developmental framing, the other needs clinical care.

Initiation does not ask for her to be ready. It begins regardless.

She needs the rupture to be named as a rupture — acknowledged as real, and real in a specific developmental sense. Not a breakdown. Not a sign that she is doing it wrong. An inauguration into something that will cost her, for a while, more than she knew she had.

She also needs, urgently, what the nervous system essay described: physiological tending. The postpartum body is in a state of genuine vulnerability — the placental wound healing, the hormonal system recalibrating, the nervous system running at extraordinary cost. The traditional 40-day postpartum rest practices found across so many cultures were not superstition. They were the empirical observation, built over millennia, of what Initiation requires. Warmth, rest, nourishing food, physical tending, and the presence of other women who have been through it and can say: this is the fire. It does not last forever. You are still here.

Stage 4: Disorientation — High function, low feeling

Disorientation is the stage that is most often missed by the clinical frameworks that do attempt to map early motherhood — because it arrives after the acute crisis of Initiation has passed, and from the outside, the woman looks fine.

She is functioning. She has adapted. She has learned the rhythms of the baby, developed competencies she did not have three months ago, assembled a working version of daily life. The external observer — the pediatrician, the partner, the colleagues who see her at a work function — sees a woman who has pulled it together. And they are not entirely wrong. She has pulled something together.

What they cannot see is what is missing.

Disorientation is characterized by a specific quality of internal absence: high function paired with low feeling. The previous self — the one who had a relationship to her own desires, her own intellectual life, her own sense of forward motion — is not fully present. The new self is not yet assembled. What exists in the space between is a woman who is moving through the days with competence while something essential feels absent or starved.

Robert Kegan’s concept of the holding environment is useful here (1982). Kegan argues that development requires not just challenge but support — that growth happens at the edge between confirmation and contradiction, between the security of being understood and the friction of being stretched. Disorientation is the stage in which neither of those things is adequately available. The old holding environment — the career, the identity structures, the social world that knew who she was — no longer quite fits. The new one has not yet formed. She is, in Kegan’s phrase, in over her head: facing developmental demands that exceed the current capacity of her operating system.

This is the stage most likely to present in a clinical office as depression — and often does, because the symptom profile overlaps substantially: low hedonic tone, difficulty accessing previous sources of pleasure, a sense of flatness or unreality, irritability, a feeling of performing a role rather than inhabiting a life. The differential is not in the presence of these experiences but in their quality and trajectory. Whether clinical intervention is required depends on a more nuanced inquiry than a screener alone allows — one that asks not only what is broken but what is unfinished.

Disenfranchised grief is particularly active at this stage (Doka, 1989). The losses that began in Initiation — of the previous self, the previous life, the previous relationship to time and body and work — are still present, but the social permission to grieve them has largely expired. The culture around the mother has moved on. The baby is no longer a newborn. The acute crisis is assumed to be over. And so the grief, which has no recognized container and no social acknowledgment, goes underground. It surfaces as resentment, as numbness, as a vague and unlocatable sadness that presents without a clear object — because the object of the grief, the previous self, is not something the culture has taught the mother she is allowed to mourn.

One of the most important clinical and relational interventions at this stage is the explicit naming of the grief. Not the minimization of it (but you have so much), not the silver lining (this time goes so fast), but the direct acknowledgment: you are mourning something real. The spontaneity, the solitude, the version of your life that no longer exists. That loss is real. It is not ingratitude. It does not mean you love your child insufficiently. It means you are a person who had a life, and that life has changed in ways you are still absorbing.

Rozsika Parker’s work on maternal ambivalence is worth naming directly here (1995): the simultaneous experience of love and grief — of fierce devotion and real longing — is not pathology. It is the mark of a psychologically mature mind. An infant cannot hold ambivalence. A developing mother can. That is not a problem to be solved. It is growth happening in real time, often without any witness to see it.

She is high-functioning and half-starved. The outside world sees only the first part.

Disorientation is also the stage in which the maternal nervous system is most at risk of chronic dysregulation. The acute crisis of Initiation mobilized support — however inadequate — that has now faded. The sustained cost of co-regulating an infant, managing a household, and performing normalcy without adequate resourcing is beginning to compound. The sensory overload is not new but it is cumulative. The touched-out feeling, the snapping wire, the sense of being perpetually behind on a debt that is never going to be paid off — these are the lived signature of a nervous system running without a floor.

The woman in Disorientation is not in the goo anymore. She is past the acute fire. But she is still in the rebuilding, and the rebuilding is slow, and she is doing much of it alone. The most useful thing a community, a clinician, or a partner can offer her at this stage is not a solution. It is sustained, unhurried presence — the willingness to keep returning, to keep asking, to keep receiving the answer without trying to fix it.

Stage 5: Integration — The Emergence of an Authored Self

Integration does not arrive as an event. It arrives as a gradual change in the quality of experience — a shift that the woman often notices only in retrospect, because she is too close to it to see the transition happening.

Something begins to cohere. Not because the difficulty is over — there are children still, and demands, and the specific exhaustion of a life organized around the needs of small people who do not yet have the capacity to recognize that the needs of the person holding them also exist. But something in the internal landscape begins to feel less provisional. The mosaic begins to hold.

Integration is the stage at which the new self begins to arrive into legibility. The woman who had been operating between identities — no longer entirely the person she was before, not yet the person she will be — begins to recognize herself again. Not as the same person. Something different. Something that includes the pre-mother woman but is no longer organized by her as its primary reference point.

In Kegan’s framework, this is the emergence of the Self-Authoring Mind (1994). The woman at this stage is beginning to construct her identity from an internal value system rather than from external authority. She is less likely to ask am I doing this right? and more likely to ask what do I actually believe is right? The difference sounds subtle but is profound. It is the difference between a woman who is mothering according to the scripts she inherited and a woman who is mothering according to values she has tested, examined, and claimed as her own.

This shift does not mean certainty. The Self-Authoring Mind is not a state of having all the answers. It is a state of having an internal locus from which to evaluate the questions. The mother at this stage can hold ambiguity — about parenting, about her own needs, about the relationship, about what kind of work matters and what doesn’t — without the ambiguity destabilizing her sense of self. She has a floor now. She built it herself.

Jane Loevinger’s model of ego development offers a complementary frame (1976). Her Conscientious Stage is characterized by long-term self-evaluated standards — standards genuinely internalized rather than inherited — and by a more differentiated inner life: the capacity to hold one’s own complexity, to understand that the self contains contradictions that do not need to be resolved. The dissolution stripped away some of the simpler stories. What is left is more complicated and more accurate.

The relational world often shifts visibly at this stage. Friendships that were organized around the pre-mother identity sometimes fall away or diminish — not necessarily through conflict, but through a growing mismatch between what the woman now needs from connection and what those particular relationships offer. New relationships, organized around shared developmental experience and genuine mutual recognition, often begin to emerge. The woman becomes more capable of asking for what she needs, and more capable of recognizing when it is not being offered. The Self-Authoring Mind can say no in ways the Socialized Mind could not.

Romantic partnerships, if they exist, often experience a significant reorganization at this stage. The pre-mother relational dynamic — whatever it was — may no longer fit the woman who has come through Disorientation and into Integration. She has changed in ways that the relationship may or may not be able to accommodate. This is not a sign that the relationship has failed. It is a sign that the relationship is being asked to update its operating system along with everything else.

She does not return to herself. She arrives at herself, for the first time, from a different direction.

The mother in Integration is often, paradoxically, the hardest to support — because she looks fine, sounds fine, and is, in many measurable ways, fine. The crisis is past. The coherence is emerging. What she needs at this stage is less intervention and more witness: someone to reflect back that what has happened to her is significant, that the development she has undergone is real, that the self that has emerged from the fire is not simply the pre-mother self recovered but something genuinely new and genuinely hard-won.

She also needs, often for the first time, permission to want things for herself again — to have desires that are not organized around the infant or the household, to begin the slow recovery of an interior life that was deprioritized during Initiation and Disorientation. Integration is the stage at which the question who am I now? begins to be answerable. And part of the answer is: someone who still has a self that is not entirely defined by her relationship to her child. Recovering that self — the desires, the intellectual life, the creative work, the friendships — is not selfishness. It is the work of the stage.

Stage 6: Expansion — Arriving at a Self Motherhood Helped Build

Expansion is the stage that is most difficult to write about without sounding like a self-help book — because what happens at this stage is genuinely extraordinary, and extraordinary things tend to attract language that oversimplifies them.

What happens is this: the skills and capacities that were forged under the developmental pressure of the early stages reveal themselves as something other than maternal competencies. The mother who has been managing the emotional regulation of a small household, navigating the developmental stages of a growing child, holding enormous ambiguity without collapsing into it, tolerating frustration and uncertainty as a daily condition — this woman has been building something. Not despite the difficulty. Inside it.

The crisis management capacity that developed in the first year of a newborn is, structurally, the same capacity as executive crisis management — the ability to triage, to act under uncertainty, to hold multiple complex systems in mind simultaneously. The emotional intelligence required to co-regulate an infant, to read the nonverbal cues of a pre-verbal person, to manage one’s own dysregulation in the service of another’s stability — this is, structurally, the emotional intelligence required for leadership, for clinical practice, for any work that requires the sustained, attuned management of human beings in difficulty. The systems thinking required to maintain a household with children — the forecasting, the logistics, the anticipation of needs, the recovery from failure — is, structurally, the same capacity as organizational systems thinking.

None of this was recognized as such. It was called mothering. It did not go on a resume.

At the Expansion stage, the woman begins to recognize the correspondence. This recognition is not always comfortable — in fact, it is often accompanied by a particular form of anger: the recognition of how much was built in conditions of invisibility, and how little it was named or valued. The anger at this stage is not the boundary-alarm anger of Initiation and Disorientation. It is something more structural: the anger of a person who has done significant developmental work and looks around to find that the culture in which she did it has no language for what she built.

In Robert Kegan’s terms, Expansion is the consolidation of the Self-Authoring Mind and, for some women, the beginning of the Self-Transforming Mind (1994) — the developmental capacity to hold multiple self-authored systems simultaneously, to see one’s own value framework as one possible framework among others, to be genuinely curious about perspectives that differ from one’s own rather than threatened by them. The Self-Transforming Mind is rare. For some women, the sustained developmental pressure of motherhood — the constant demand to update, revise, let go of certainty — appears to create conditions in which it can begin to emerge.

The capacities built in ordinary mothering are often far more transferable than the culture knows how to name.

She is not a mother who used to be something. She is something that motherhood helped build.

The relational world at this stage often shifts again — toward people who can hold complexity, who are not organized by the need for external validation, who can engage with ambiguity as interesting rather than threatening. The friendships that form at this stage tend to be among the deepest of adult life. The professional world shifts too. The woman who has spent years building a Self-Authored value system often finds she can no longer subordinate it to institutions organized on the Socialized Mind’s terms. This is not mid-life crisis. It is a departure. The self she has built no longer fits inside the previous container.

Expansion is not a destination. The woman at this stage is not finished becoming. But she is, for the first time, becoming from a foundation she built — rather than one she inherited without knowing she could question it. There is a particular quality of steadiness that comes with this. Not certainty. Not the absence of difficulty. Something more durable than either: a self that has been tested and held.

A Final Word on Witnessing

The map matters. A woman who knows where she is on the Path experiences her own development differently than a woman who has no developmental language for what is happening to her. It does not make the hard stages easier. But it changes their meaning — converts I am falling apart into I am in Disorientation, and this is what Disorientation asks for. That shift is the difference between fighting your own experience and moving, however imperfectly, with it.

But maps need companions. The woman on the Path needs presence more than she needs information — someone willing to stay, to receive the full weight of where she is without trying to make it lighter. The faith, carried on her behalf until she can hold it herself, that the dissolution is not the end.

That faith is what the traditional cultures held in ceremony, in the month of sitting, in the elder women who moved in and did the cooking and said, quietly, with their presence: this matters. You matter. What you are going through is real.

You are on a path. It has stages. You are not lost. What is happening inside you is not meaningless, and it is not random. It is a developmental passage. And even here — in the fire, in the fog, in the gray middle — you are still becoming.

In the essays that follow, I’ll be expanding each stage of The Matrescent Path in greater depth. Rather than leaving the framework at the level of a map, I want to slow down inside each phase — its texture, its pressures, its griefs, its shifts, and the forms of becoming it makes possible.

References

Brave Heart, M. Y. H., & DeBruyn, L. M. (1998). The American Indian Holocaust: Healing historical unresolved grief. American Indian and Alaska Native Mental Health Research, 8(2), 56–78.

Bridges, W. (1980). Transitions: Making sense of life’s changes. Addison-Wesley.

Doka, K. J. (1989). Disenfranchised grief: Recognizing hidden sorrow. Lexington Books.

Feldman, R. (2017). The neurobiology of human attachments. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(2), 80–99.

Freud, S. (1917). Mourning and melancholia. Standard Edition, Vol. 14, 237–258. Hogarth Press.

Hoekzema, E., Barba-Müller, E., Pozzobon, C., Picado, M., Lucco, F., García-García, D., ... & Vilarroya, O. (2017). Pregnancy leads to long-lasting changes in human brain structure. Nature Neuroscience, 20(2), 287–296.

Kegan, R. (1982). The evolving self: Problem and process in human development. Harvard University Press.

Kegan, R. (1994). In over our heads: The mental demands of modern life. Harvard University Press.

Loevinger, J. (1976). Ego development: Conceptions and theories. Jossey-Bass.

Parker, R. (1995). Torn in two: The experience of maternal ambivalence. Virago Press.

Pihama, L., Reynolds, P., Smith, C., Reid, J., Smith, L. T., & Te Nana, R. (2014). Positioning historical trauma theory within Aotearoa New Zealand. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 10(3), 248–262.

Porges, S. W. (2011). The polyvagal theory: Neurophysiological foundations of emotions, attachment, communication, and self-regulation. W. W. Norton.

Raphael, D. (1973). The tender gift: Breastfeeding. Prentice-Hall.

Walker, M. (2017). Why we sleep: Unlocking the power of sleep and dreams. Scribner.